A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Paola Rocio Peña Rodriguez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto no se logró una adecuada presentación del concepto de violación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por reiterar en el escrito de subsanación las falencias identificadas en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena considera que el recurso presentado no prospera porque no logró una adecuada presentación del concepto de violación.
Con base en lo anterior, se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del veinte (20) de agosto de dos mil quince (2015), que rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Paola Rocio Pena Rodriguez contra el articulo 234 (parcial) del Codigo General del Proceso.
- Segundo. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision a la recurrente, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
- Comuniquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.